From the transcript of the Connecticut Senate, May 31, 2007 - debate on SB 1312, a bill to do a pilot study of Election Day Registration:

"Substitute for Senate Bill 1312, An Act Concerning Election Day Registration...

. . .

"SEN. SLOSSBERG:

Thank you, Mr. President. I move acceptance of the Joint Committee's Favorable Report and passage of the bill.

THE CHAIR:

Acting on approval of the bill, will you remark further, Ma'am?

SEN. SLOSSBERG:

Yes, thank you, Mr. President, the underlying bill here regards Election Day registration and the Clerk has in his possession LCO 8441, and I would ask that he call it and I seek leave to summarize.

THE CHAIR:

Mr. Clerk.

THE CLERK:

LCO 8441, which will be designated as Senate Amendment Schedule "A". It is offered by Senator Slossberg of the 14th District.

THE CHAIR:

Senator Slossberg.

SEN. SLOSSBERG:

Thank you, Mr. President. I move adoption.

THE CHAIR:

Please proceed.

SEN. SLOSSBERG:

This bill, this amendment before us deals with Election Day registration and what it does is gives us an opportunity for the first time to actually collect data on whether Election Day registration does all the things that it is purported to do.

The bill in front of us limits Election Day registration to the 2008 Presidential Preference primary. It allows unaffiliated voters to register at a major party on primary day and vote in a primary. A voter would still be subject to a three-month waiting period for transferring from one major party to another.

It requires the primary day registration occur in a registrar's office in a multi-town district or in either the registrar's office or in a polling place at a single district town, if the registrars have all the necessary supplies for voter registration in the polling place.

The applicant would appear in the prescribed place to register, they would fill out an application and the registrar would check the statewide centralized voter list to check for duplicate registration.

At that time, the applicant will be asked to prove identity and residency. This can come in the form of United States Passport, a military I. D. card, a current and valid photo identification, or a utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck or government document that shows the name and the address of the applicant.

For students the bill makes special accommodations and they can use a student I. D. in combination with one of the above I. D. 's or a registration fee from college. If the elector is qualified, the registrar will give the voter an acceptance letter and then, at that time, give them a ballot.

They will also check to make sure they are not registered in any other municipality, and if it is determined that they were previously registered in another town, they will be contacting the other municipality.

The voter will fill out the ballot at that same location, so it's one-stop shopping, place it in a depository envelope with their name on it and then leave the ballot with the registrar of voters.

At that time, the voted ballots will be delivered for counting to the polls or to central counting throughout the day, just as our absentee ballots are delivered. Once the ballots get to their location to be counted, the ballots and the names are compared to the list created by the registrars to ensure that only proper ballots have been delivered.

The ballots are then opened and counted in the same manner as our absentee ballots, to ensure proper procedure and to protect identity. After the election, registrars will send a confirmation letter to the residential address provided by the voter.

If such letter is returned as undeliverable by the U. S. Post Office, the registrars would refer the matter to Elections Enforcement for additional investigation. After the primary day registration, this amendment creates a statewide demonstration in 2008.

The Secretary of State would conduct a survey of cost, turnout, any allegations of fraud, staffing, and party enrollment statistics, and forward such information to the GAE Committee within one month following the primary. The rest of this bill is mostly technical.

It updates the requirements regarding preparing voter lists to comply with current technology, which now make production of such lists readily available, and it provides those current lists to be available on demand. It updates the statutes regarding the process of voting by persons with a disability.

And there are additional technical updates to deal with our new Mark Sense system, and other technical changes to a lot of registrars to properly administer elections. Election day registration, as many of you I'm sure know, deals with the problem that we have in our country of low voter turnout.

Only 51% of the population voted in the 2000 Presidential election. The voter registration composed barriers to voter participation in our Democracy, and as we know, the fundamental building block of our Democracy is our right to vote.

Currently, seven states have Election Day registration in existence, and these states have consistently achieved a higher voter turnout that is 8% to 15% better than the national average. One of the great things about Election Day registration and it deals with the way we do our campaigns that we conduct our campaigns now.

So many people are finding late interest in the campaign. As the evening is late, and it's 11: 30 and there's a lot more to say about Election Day registration, though. I did just want to make one or two minor points, with regard to why we're doing this on a primary date.

We've heard a lot of issues with regard to whether we shouldn't be. This gives us the perfect opportunity to test out all of the theories. Does it increase voter turnout, is there a problem with voter fraud, or does this really work, and in a way that doesn't affect the outcome of an election.

It's a Presidential Preference primary. All it does is register our preferences. It's Democrats against Democrats, Republicans against Republicans, under current law an individual can register to vote and an unaffiliated voter can enroll in a party up until noon preceding the day of the primary.

So basically all we are doing is extending the time to register by 18 hours. This will give us an opportunity to either identify and address any problems and give us a real chance to know what is going on.

In addition, with regard to the Presidential primary, we know that we're talking about super-duper Tuesday. If we do this demonstration project, it's also a great way for Connecticut to get to stand out as trying something different on that day, gives a little bit of spice to our Presidential primary.

I think we will already have, but I think it would also give us a great opportunity to test out this theory. In summary then I would ask that the Chamber support this opportunity to find out what the benefits are of Election Day registration. Thank you, Mr. President."
_____________________________________________________________________________

From the transcript of the Connecticut Senate, September 20, 2007 - debate on SB 1600, a  bill to reduce corruption in awarding state contracts:

"Senate Bill Number 1600, AN ACT CONCERNING CLEAN CONTRACTING STANDARDS

. . .

Emergency Certified Bill 1600, An Act Concerning Clean Contracting Standards. The bill is accompanied by Emergency Certification, signed Donald E. Williams, Jr. , President Pro Tempore of the Senate, James A. Amann, Speaker of the House of Representatives.

THE CHAIR:

Senator Slossberg.

SEN. SLOSSBERG:

Thank you, Mr. President. Good afternoon.

THE CHAIR:

Good afternoon.

SEN. SLOSSBERG:

I move passage of the bill.

THE CHAIR:

On passage of the bill, will you remark?

SEN. SLOSSBERG:

Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, this legislation is the same legislation as we passed in June of this year, with some minor technical changes. We passed this by a 34-2 vote.

Unfortunately, as it was the last day of session, the House ran out of time to take it up. So here again we are today to hopefully pass the clean contracting legislation.

We all know the history of contracting in our state, that we've had issues with contracting, some of them, some of those problems that continue today.

This bill protects our public interests by making state contracting open, transparent, accountable, and uniform. And I would just let people know that this is a compromised document.

Our unions, our nonprofits, the existing standards board have all participated in a process of long negotiations with the Executive Branch, and our other Legislators as well, and Governor Rell. And I would just ask that, hopefully, today is the day that Connecticut finally has clean contracting standards, and I would ask for a roll call vote. Thank you.

. . .

SEN. LOONEY:

Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, the need for contracting reform has been part of the unfinished business of the state since the unfortunate time of the scandal involving Governor Rowland.

This bill, at long last, gives us the kind of change and structural reform that we believe is necessary. The agreement was reached at the end of the session. It's unfortunate that, in the crunch of the last night, the House did not have an opportunity to make it part of the work of the regular session.

But I want to commend Senator Slossberg for her work throughout the regular session, and in the time since then, for being so purposeful and so capable and so strategic in dealing with all of the competing interests that needed to be reconciled in one way or another to make this a workable bill, which it is.

She and all the others who put in so much time on this deserve our commendation. Thank you, Mr. President.

THE CHAIR:

Thank you, Senator Looney. Will you remark? Senator Williams.

SEN. WILLIAMS:

Thank you, Mr. President. I too rise to support the bill. I'd like to thank Senator Slossberg for her hard work on this. It's been a tremendous amount of hard work, Senator Slossberg, and even right up through today.

You know, without recounting the history of this bill, here's hoping the fifth time is the charm. But on a serious note, we know that this is vitally important to the State of Connecticut because it does go to the integrity of our state contracting process, and we want our constituents around the state to have confidence in that, and this bill will put us on the path toward that. Thank you, Mr. President.

THE CHAIR:

Thank you, Senator Williams. Will you remark? Will you remark further on the bill? If not, Mr. Clerk, will you please call the roll. The machine will be open.

THE CLERK:

An immediate roll call has been ordered in the Senate. Will all Senators please return to the Chamber.

An immediate roll call has been ordered in the Senate. Will all Senators please return to the Chamber.

THE CHAIR:

Have all Senators voted? Have all Senators voted? If all Senators have voted, the machine will be locked and the Clerk will call the tally.

THE CLERK:

Motion is on passage of Emergency Certified Bill 1600.

Total number voting, 35; necessary for passage, 18. Those voting “yea”, 33; those voting “nay”, 2. Those absent and not voting, 1.

THE CHAIR:

Senate Bill 1600 passes."