From the transcript of the Connecticut House of Representatives - June 5, 2007:

"REP. GENGA: (10th)

Thank you. For the record, I'd like to speak on the merits of this LCO amendment. The purpose of this bill is to provide protection for young children, under the age of seven or under 60 pounds, from secondhand smoke. The purpose of doing this is to provide education to the public.

Over the last 20 years, scientifically and medically, we've learned much more than we've ever known about smoking and secondhand smoke. The United States Center for Disease Control has states that one cigarette, one cigarette, emits 11 toxic poisons and 250 carcinogens which are cancer causing.

The American Lung Association has stated that small children, that we refer to here, have more infections and diseases from secondhand smoke, pneumonia, bronchitis, asthma attacks. And I tell you that 150,000 to 300,000 young babies under the age of 18 months have infections from secondhand smoke.

Young children in a closed vehicle should not be breathing this kind of smoke. It's the most confined area. Young children, under the age of eight, do not have their lungs fully developed. Their immune system is less developed and more vulnerable to secondhand smoke.

The secondhand smoke to a young child is very disproportionate compared to an adult because of their body mass.

In a study that was completed last year by Harvard University School of Public Health, the study showed that with the windows closed in a vehicle, a small child will develop or be as susceptible to multiple times of the dangerous levels, the EPA dangerous levels, of secondhand smoke.

With the windows open, a young child is still as susceptible as anybody in a bar or restaurant, which we've already developed, or we've already provided legislation to ban smoking.

So the whole idea behind this is to protect those young children who don't have the opportunity. They do not have the same thing as an adult, the ability to remove themselves from a situation.

With all of that said, I do not want to jeopardize the underlying bill and I understand that would happen, even though there's support here. So I want to thank all my colleagues for their support and encouragement on this bill and withdraw this amendment. Thank you, Madam Speaker.

DEPUTY SPEAKER FRITZ:

I thank you, Sir, for your kindness and your foresight and for protecting all of us. The question before the Chamber is about withdrawing this amendment. Is there objection? Hearing none, the amendment is withdrawn."